Jump to content

Fred: Revision history

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

23 August 2014

2 August 2014

29 July 2014

6 July 2014

4 July 2014

8 June 2014

  • curprev 16:0316:03, 8 June 2014 >Josephyr 3,225 bytes −4 No edit summary
  • curprev 15:4015:40, 8 June 2014 >Josephyr m 3,229 bytes 0 Changed protection level for "Fred": Counter-productive edit warring: AMK agrees with this (‎[edit=sysop] (indefinite) ‎[move=sysop] (indefinite))
  • curprev 15:4015:40, 8 June 2014 >Josephyr 3,229 bytes −12 No edit summary
  • curprev 15:1615:16, 8 June 2014 >120d 3,241 bytes +5 He never said it should not be.
  • curprev 13:4813:48, 8 June 2014 >Josephyr 3,236 bytes −5 you will also remember in that very same thread, AMK said his name should not be Frederick
  • curprev 12:1012:10, 8 June 2014 >120d 3,241 bytes +5 Actually, I did consult the community. The Names thread has proof of this. Do you have any problem with this besides that it is unconfirmed? Also, It is not necessarily false, it is just unconfirmed.
  • curprev 12:0412:04, 8 June 2014 >Road Runner1 m 3,236 bytes +5 No edit summary
  • curprev 12:0112:01, 8 June 2014 >Josephyr 3,231 bytes −10 I would like to point out that you made the template without consulting the community, or Andrew. And since this is false information (since it isn't proven) this is also a block able offense.
  • curprev 09:5709:57, 8 June 2014 >120d 3,241 bytes +35 You are the only one who cares any more so I suggest you stop. I don't know how clear I have to be. As long as the template is here the name will not be changed. I am close to requesting that you be blocked for not following the rules of the template
  • curprev 08:1608:16, 8 June 2014 >Josephyr 3,206 bytes −35 please stop changing it; it is unconfirmed information, and on the borderline of false information.
  • curprev 01:5801:58, 8 June 2014 >Road Runner1 3,241 bytes +16 No edit summary
  • curprev 01:5801:58, 8 June 2014 >Road Runner1 3,225 bytes +1 Quotes
  • curprev 00:3000:30, 8 June 2014 >Nicko756 3,224 bytes +6 No edit summary

7 June 2014

  • curprev 23:5723:57, 7 June 2014 >120d 3,218 bytes +11 No edit summary
  • curprev 20:5620:56, 7 June 2014 >Nicko756 3,207 bytes +6 No edit summary
  • curprev 20:4520:45, 7 June 2014 >Nicko756 3,201 bytes −5 No edit summary
  • curprev 20:2920:29, 7 June 2014 >Josephyr 3,206 bytes −12 Undo revision 485427 by 120d (talk) I have made no such agreement. And, since it is unconfirmed info, it will not remain on the page. The template is just signifying that his name is disputed.
  • curprev 20:2720:27, 7 June 2014 >120d 3,218 bytes +12 That was not the agreement. Also, it makes no sense your way because there is no unconfirmed part because "Rechid" is confirmed.
  • curprev 20:2520:25, 7 June 2014 >Josephyr 3,206 bytes −12 hurray, it's good we have that template. So when Frederick is confirmed, we can add it
  • curprev 20:1520:15, 7 June 2014 >120d 3,218 bytes +33 I have now made the template. I have put it on the page, so do not revert this edit.
  • curprev 20:0420:04, 7 June 2014 >Josephyr 3,185 bytes −12 Undo revision 485397 by 120d (talk) it is unconfirmed, yes. So why keep adding it? Just leave his only known name for now
  • curprev 20:0220:02, 7 June 2014 >120d 3,197 bytes +12 It is only unconfirmed information. It is not necessarily false information.
  • curprev 20:0020:00, 7 June 2014 >Josephyr 3,185 bytes −12 Undo revision 485392 by 120d (talk) I shall not leave it alone because it is false information until proven true
  • curprev 19:5719:57, 7 June 2014 >120d 3,197 bytes +12 Why don't you leave it alone? I have come up with a compromise. This page will be the same (my way) and we will add a template that addresses that these names need to be confirmed by SpongeBob staff members.
  • curprev 19:5419:54, 7 June 2014 >Josephyr 3,185 bytes −12 Undo revision 485385 by 120d (talk) not how it works, we have *proof* that his name is Fred, but no proof that his name is Frederick. Please leave it for now.
  • curprev 19:5319:53, 7 June 2014 >120d 3,197 bytes +12 I can say the same thing about your way. I need proof that his name is JUST Fred and not Fredrick.
  • curprev 19:4219:42, 7 June 2014 >Josephyr 3,185 bytes −12 Undo revision 485361 by 120d (talk) you must provide actual proof that his name is Frederick, otherwise you are adding false information
  • curprev 19:3219:32, 7 June 2014 >120d 3,197 bytes +12 Until a proposal has been passed this shall remain the same.
  • curprev 19:2619:26, 7 June 2014 >Josephyr 3,185 bytes −12 just to be safe, let's leave it as "Fred"
  • curprev 10:2410:24, 7 June 2014 >120d 3,197 bytes −4 This is the full first name of "Fred"

6 June 2014

26 May 2014

11 May 2014

3 May 2014

26 April 2014

16 April 2014

11 April 2014

10 April 2014

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)